In another extraordinary twist to the "liquid bombs" plot trial, the jury have been dismissed. See, for example:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7896942.stm.

It was odd, to say the least, to find that the reports of the start of the retrial in most news outlets did not even mention the fact that it was a retrial. See for example:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/court-told-of-liquid-bomb-plot-to-down-airliners-1624885.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5754677.ece
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/feb/18/liquid-bomb-plot-trial
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7894755.stm.

None of these stories bothered to mention that this was a retrial.

Obsolete comments:
http://www.septicisle.info/2008/09/crying-over-spilt-liquid.html
http://www.septicisle.info/2009/02/its-deja-vu-all-over-again.html/

See also:
http://nafeez.blogspot.com/2006/09/ex-uk-intel-official-says-liquid.html
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Sources_August_Terror_Plot_Fiction_Underscoring_0918.html
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2006/08/the_uk_terror_p.html
http://peroxideplotters.blogspot.com/2008/08/ludicrouser-and-ludicrouser-alleged.html
http://disruptive.org.uk/2006/08/28/airport_security.html
http://disruptive.org.uk/2006/09/18/airport_security_2.html
http://disruptive.org.uk/2006/12/14/airport_security_3.html
http://disruptive.org.uk/2006/12/15/airport_security_4.html.